Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: The HAKA Multicenter Retrospective Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic heart failure (HF) has high rates of mortality and hospitalization in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (aCKD). However, randomized clinical trials have systematically excluded aCKD population. We have investigated current HF therapy in patients receiving clinical care in specialized aCKD units. METHODS: The Heart And Kidney Audit (HAKA) was a cross-sectional and retrospective real-world study including outpatients with aCKD and HF from 29 Spanish centers. The objective was to evaluate how the treatment of HF in patients with aCKD complied with the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HF, especially regarding the foundational drugs: renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). RESULTS: Among 5,012 aCKD patients, 532 (13%) had a diagnosis of HF. Of them, 20% had reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 13% mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and 67% preserved EF (HFpEF). Only 9.3% of patients with HFrEF were receiving quadruple therapy with RASi/ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i, but the majority were not on the maximum recommended doses. None of the patients with HFrEF and CKD G5 received quadruple therapy. Among HFmrEF patients, approximately half and two-thirds were receiving RASi and/or BB, respectively, while less than 15% received ARNI, MRA, or SGLT2i. Less than 10% of patients with HFpEF were receiving SGLT2i. CONCLUSIONS: Under real-world conditions, HF in aCKD patients is sub-optimally treated. Increased awareness of current guidelines and pragmatic trials specifically enrolling these patients represent unmet medical needs.

Association between stopping renin-angiotensin system inhibitors immediately before hemodialysis initiation and subsequent cardiovascular events.

It is controversial whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) should be stopped in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, it was reported that stopping RASIs in advanced CKD was associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events; however, it remains unclear whether stopping RASIs before dialysis initiation affects clinical outcomes after dialysis, which this study aimed to evaluate. In this multicenter prospective cohort study in Japan, we included 717 patients (mean age, 67 years; 68% male) who had a nephrology care duration ≥90 days, initiated hemodialysis, and used RASIs 3 months before hemodialysis initiation. The multivariable adjusted Cox models were used to compare mortality and CV event risk between 650 (91%) patients who continued RASIs until hemodialysis initiation and 67 (9.3%) patients who stopped RASIs. During a median follow-up period of 3.5 years, 170 (24%) patients died and 228 (32%) experienced CV events. Compared with continuing RASIs, stopping RASIs was unassociated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.34) but was associated with higher CV events (aHR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.06-2.38). Subgroup analyses showed that the risk of stopping RASIs for CV events was particularly high in patients aged <75 years, with a significant interaction between stopping RASIs and age. This study revealed that patients who stopped RASIs immediately before dialysis initiation were associated with subsequent higher CV events. Active screening for CV disease may be especially beneficial for these patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone Blockade in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular and renal benefits of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade are not well-established in patients with advanced CKD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify potential risks and benefits from RAAS blockade in patients with CKD stage 4-5. METHODS: A Medline search from inception to November 2022 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with CKD stage 4-5 (estimated GFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73m2) comparing RAAS blockade against placebo or alternative antihypertensive therapy. Different intervention strategies were assessed (RAAS use vs non-use, initiation vs placebo/alternative therapy or discontinuation vs continuation). The primary outcome was progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The risk ratio (RR) was estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine RCTs (1,150 patients) were included. In RCTs, RAAS blockade was associated with a significant reduction in progression to ESKD: RR 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 - 0.96; p = 0.01). There was no benefit from RAAS blockade on all-cause mortality or MACE: RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.63 - 1.65; p = 0.93) and RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.49- 1.57; p = 0.65), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RAAS blockade may be considered in selected patients with CKD stage 4-5 to delay progression to ESKD.

Pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease in hemodialysis patients: a survey in French nephrologists / Prurit associé à la maladie rénale chronique chez les patients hémodialysés : une enquête auprès des néphrologues français

Background: Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is common in hemodialysis patients and severely impairs their quality of life, but the practices of nephrologists remain poorly known. Methods: The objective of this on-line survey was to describe the management of CKD-aP in French nephrologists affiliated with the French-speaking Society of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation (SFNDT) and involved in hemodialysis. Results: In total, 122 questionnaires were completed and 100 were usable. Nephrologists reported they personally managed a median of 52 patients; they estimated that the CKD-aP prevalence in their hemodialysis patients was a median of 10% (IQR, 6.3-17.2); 6% of nephrologists reported not following any patient with CKD-aP. In case of CKD-aP, the first-intention intervention was the evaluation of phosphocalcic metabolism (53.5%) and verification of dialysis adequacy (52%). For moderate-to-severe CKD-aP, the first-line prescription was topical therapy (71.3%), antihistamine (23.2%) and membrane change (15.9%). Patients were referred to a dermatologist mainly in case of treatment failure (86.9%) or scratching lesions (40.4%). Available treatments were considered ineffective for 50.5% of nephrologists, partially effective for 45.5% and effective for only 4%. Conclusion: These results show that according to the opinion of nephrologists, the pruritus prevalence is low in dialysis patients. This is inconsistent with studies based on systematic patient interviews, thus suggesting that pruritus is a symptom overlooked by nephrologists. In the context of the arrival of a new drug for pruritus, patients should be more questioned about this symptom in order to propose this treatment.

Introduction: Le prurit associé à l'insuffisance rénale chronique (Pa-IRC) est fréquent chez les patients hémodialysés et altère gravement leur qualité de vie, mais les pratiques des néphrologues restent mal connues. Méthodes: L'objectif de cette enquête en ligne était de décrire la prise en charge du Pa-IRC par les néphrologues français hémodialyseurs affiliés à la Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation (SFNDT). Résultats: Au total, 122 questionnaires ont été remplis et 100 étaient utilisables. Les néphrologues suivaient personnellement 52 patients (médiane). Ils estimaient que la prévalence du Pa-IRC chez ces patients était de 10 % (médiane ; écart interquartile : 6,3-17,2) ; 6 % des néphrologues ont déclaré ne suivre aucun patient atteint de Pa-IRC. En cas de Pa-IRC, l'intervention de première intention était l'évaluation du métabolisme phosphocalcique (53,5 %) et la vérification de la qualité de dialyse (52 %). Pour le Pa-IRC modéré à sévère, la prescription de première intention était un traitement topique (71,3 %), un antihistaminique (23,2 %) et un changement de membrane (15,9 %). Les traitements disponibles étaient considérés comme inefficaces pour 50,5 % des néphrologues, partiellement efficaces pour 45,5 % et efficaces pour seulement 4 %. Conclusion: Ces résultats montrent que selon l'opinion des néphrologues, la prévalence du prurit est faible chez les patients dialysés. Ceci est en contradiction avec les études basées sur des entretiens systématiques avec les patients, suggérant ainsi que le prurit est un symptôme sous-estimé par les néphrologues. Dans le contexte de l'arrivée d'un nouveau médicament pour le prurit, les patients devraient être davantage interrogés sur ce symptôme afin de proposer ce traitement.

Nationwide in-hospital mortality and morbidity analysis of COVID-19 in advanced chronic kidney disease, dialysis and kidney transplant recipients.

Background: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and kidney transplants (KT) are at an elevated risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality. A comprehensive comparison of morbidity and mortality between these populations with kidney disease and individuals without any kidney disease is lacking. Methods: We analysed the 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for non-elective adult COVID-19 hospitalizations, categorizing patients into advanced CKD, ESKD, KT, and kidney disease-free cohorts. Our analysis included a description of the distribution of comorbidities across the entire spectrum of CKD, ESKD, and KT. Additionally, we investigated in-hospital mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization, adjusting for potential confounders through multivariable regression models. Results: The study included 1,018,915 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2020. The incidence of advanced CKD, ESKD, and KT in this cohort was 5.8%, 3.8%, and 0.4%, respectively. Patients with advanced CKD, ESKD, and KT exhibited higher multimorbidity burdens, with 90.3%, 91.0%, and 75.2% of patients in each group having a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) equal to or greater than 3. The all-cause in-hospital mortality ranged from 9.3% in kidney disease-free patients to 20.6% in advanced CKD, 19.4% in ESKD, and 12.4% in KT patients. After adjusting for potential confounders at both the patient and hospital levels, CKD stages 3-5; ESKD; and KT were found to be associated with increased odds of mortality, with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of 1.34, 1.80, 2.66, 1.97, and 1.69, respectively. Conclusion: Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with advanced CKD, ESKD, or KT demonstrated a higher burden of comorbidities and increased mortality rates compared to those without kidney disease. After adjusting for confounders, CKD stages 3-5; ESKD; and KT were identified as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, illustrating a dose-response relationship between the odds of mortality and adverse outcomes as CKD progressed from stages 3 to 5. Our study highlights the necessity for enhanced management of comorbidities, targeted interventions, and vigorous vaccination efforts to mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes in the vulnerable populations of patients with CKD, ESKD, and KT.

Gaps in Modern Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease Research.

Heart failure and chronic kidney disease are common conditions and often coexist. Modern clinical trials are not entirely representative of heart failure patients in the community with respect to age and sex. Despite this, another group of heart failure patients, those with advanced chronic kidney disease, are even less represented in modern clinical trials. This review summarises the evidence for heart failure therapies across age, sex and severity of chronic kidney disease, and outlines the need for further research in these populations.

Hallazgos por ecografía Doppler arterial oftálmica en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada

Objetivo: Determinar los hallazgos por ecografía Doppler arterial oftálmica en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada. Métodos: Se efectuó un estudio observacional descriptivo y transversal con 212 órbitas de 106 pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada (estadios 4 y 5 en tratamiento dialítico). Por interrogatorio y examen físico se identificaron los factores de riesgo aterosclerótico. Además, se realizó ultrasonido orbitario y Doppler carotídeo, y solo en caso de resultar normales, se procedió a evaluar mediante ecografía Doppler las arterias oftálmicas. Resultados: Predominaron los pacientes mayores de 50 años, el sexo masculino, el color mestizo de piel y los normopesos; mientras que la hipertensión arterial, el tabaquismo y la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 fueron los factores de riesgo aterosclerótico mayoritarios. En todos los enfermos renales crónicos se demostró un incremento de la velocidad del flujo y de la resistencia vascular a nivel de las arterias oftálmicas, en tanto los casos con hipertensión arterial y diabetes mellitus tipo 2, así como los hipertensos exclusivos, mostraron los valores hemodinámicos más elevados. Conclusiones: La evaluación de las arterias oftálmicas mediante ecografía Doppler permite hacer un estudio y seguimiento más integral de los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada.

Objective: To determine ophthalmic arterial Doppler ultrasound findings in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional observational study was carried out with 212 orbits of 106 patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (stages 4 and 5 in dialysis treatment). Atherosclerotic risk factors were identified by interrogation and physical examination. In addition, orbital ultrasound and carotid Doppler were performed, and only if they were normal, the ophthalmic arteries were evaluated by Doppler ultrasound. Results: Patients older than 50 years, male sex, mestizo skin color and normal weight predominated, while arterial hypertension, smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus were the main atherosclerotic risk factors. An increase in flow velocity and vascular resistance at the level of the ophthalmic arteries was demonstrated in all chronic renal patients, while cases with arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as exclusive hypertensives, showed the highest hemodynamic values. Conclusions: The evaluation of the ophthalmic arteries by Doppler ultrasound allows a more comprehensive study and follow-up of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

The 'Phosphorus Week': involvement of Spanish nephrologists in the control of phosphorus blood levels.

BACKGROUND: The adequate control of phosphorus levels is a major concern for professionals involved in the care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), since high phosphorus levels are directly related to an increase in mortality. OBJECTIVES: To know the perception and involvement of Spanish nephrologists on the control of phosphorus levels, the so-called 'Phosphorus Week' was organized (November 13-17, 2017). METHODS: All members of the Spanish Society of Nephrology were invited to participate in an online survey, which included questions on aspects related to phosphorus control in patients with advanced CKD (aCKD) (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1, 73 m2) and in the different modalities of renal replacement therapies [peritoneal dialysis (PD), hemodialysis (HD) and renal transplantation (KT)]. RESULTS: 72 data entries were obtained in the survey with an inclusion of 7463 patients. Of them, 35.4% were on HD, 34.8% were KT, 24.2% had aCKD and 5.5% were on PD. The serum phosphorus level target for the four groups of patients was 4.5 mg/dl, with minimal variations depending on the area of ​​the national territory. The patients with better control of phosphataemia were patients with KT (93.3% had phosphorus values ​​<4.5 mg/dl), followed by patients with aCKD (65.6% with phosphorus <4.5 mg/dl). Only 53.6% of the patients on HD and 39.4% of those on PD reached the phosphorus goal <4.5 mg/dl. The group of patients on dialysis was the one in whom phosphorus binders prescribed the most (73.5% and 75.6% in HD and PD, respectively), being less frequent in patients with patients with aCKD (39.9%) and only 4.5 % in KT. CONCLUSIONS: The objectives of the Spanish nephrologists are in line with those recommended by the national and international clinical guidelines; however, there is still a wide room for improvement to achieve these goals, especially in HD and PD patients.

Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic calcification in dialysis patients and its influence on long-term recovery.

This study investigated the risk factors of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the effects of AAC and different dialysis methods on the 3-year survival rate of patients with stage 5 CKD. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on stage 5 CKD patients who received dialysis treatment. The general data were collected, and all fasting venous blood samples were harvested before the first dialysis to detect biochemical markers. The AAC was evaluated by lateral abdominal X-ray. The patients were followed up with a cut-off date of March 31, 2022, with all-cause mortality as the endpoint event. A total of 205 patients were included. multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that AAC (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.173, 95% CI 1.029-4.588, p = 0.042), advanced age (HR = 1.061, 95% CI 1.031-1.093, p < 0.001), duration of dialysis (HR = 1.015, 95% CI 1.007-1.032, p < 0.001), diabetes (HR = 3.966, 95% CI 2.164-7.269, p < 0.001), and hypertension (HR = 1.897, 95% CI 1.089-3.303, p = 0.024) were independent risk factors for 3-year mortality. However, peritoneal dialysis (HR = 0.366, 95% CI 0.165-0.812, p = 0.013), high albumin (HR = 0.882, 95% CI 0.819-0.950, p = 0.001), and high hemoglobin (HR = 0.969, 95% CI 0.942-0.997, p = 0.031) were protective factors for 3-year mortality in stage 5 CKD patients. Increased age, long-term dialysis, high level of intact parathyroid hormone, diabetes, and hypertension are closely related to the occurrence of AAC in patients with stage 5 CKD. In addition, AAC is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in patients with stage 5 CKD.

Electronic Phenotype for Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in a Veteran Health Care System Clinical Database: Systems-Based Strategy for Model Development and Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Identifying advanced (stages 4 and 5) chronic kidney disease (CKD) cohorts in clinical databases is complicated and often unreliable. Accurately identifying these patients can allow targeting this population for their specialized clinical and research needs. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted as a system-based strategy to identify all prevalent Veterans with advanced CKD for subsequent enrollment in a clinical trial. We aimed to examine the prevalence and accuracy of conventionally used diagnosis codes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based phenotypes for advanced CKD in an electronic health record (EHR) database. We sought to develop a pragmatic EHR phenotype capable of improving the real-time identification of advanced CKD cohorts in a regional Veterans health care system. METHODS: Using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure services, we extracted the source cohort of Veterans with advanced CKD based on a combination of the latest eGFR value ≤30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 or existing International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes for advanced CKD (N18.4 and N18.5) in the last 12 months. We estimated the prevalence of advanced CKD using various prior published EHR phenotypes (ie, advanced CKD diagnosis codes, using the latest single eGFR <30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2, utilizing two eGFR values) and our operational EHR phenotypes of a high-, intermediate-, and low-risk advanced CKD cohort. We evaluated the accuracy of these phenotypes by examining the likelihood of a sustained reduction of eGFR <30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 over a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Of the 133,756 active Veteran enrollees at North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (NF/SG VHS), we identified a source cohort of 1759 Veterans with advanced nondialysis CKD. Among these, 1102 (62.9%) Veterans had diagnosis codes for advanced CKD; 1391(79.1%) had the index eGFR <30 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2; and 928 (52.7%), 480 (27.2%), and 315 (17.9%) Veterans had high-, intermediate-, and low-risk advanced CKD, respectively. The prevalence of advanced CKD among Veterans at NF/SG VHS varied between 1% and 1.5% depending on the EHR phenotype. At the 6-month follow-up, the probability of Veterans remaining in the advanced CKD stage was 65.3% in the group defined by the ICD-10 codes and 90% in the groups defined by eGFR values. Based on our phenotype, 94.2% of high-risk, 71% of intermediate-risk, and 16.1% of low-risk groups remained in the advanced CKD category. CONCLUSIONS: While the prevalence of advanced CKD has limited variation between different EHR phenotypes, the accuracy can be improved by utilizing two eGFR values in a stratified manner. We report the development of a pragmatic EHR-based model to identify advanced CKD within a regional Veterans health care system in real time with a tiered approach that allows targeting the needs of the groups at risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease.

Comprehensive conservative care for the management of advanced chronic kidney disease / Le traitement conservateur dans la prise en charge de la maladie rénale chronique

Comprehensive "conservative care" is defined as any active therapeutic procedure for the management of stage 5 chronic kidney disease without recourse to dialysis. This therapeutic option is discussed in elderly, frail patients whose anticipated life expectancy is reduced with dialysis. The decision for conservative management primarily relies on an informed choice by the patient and his caregivers. This holistic approach, focused on quality of life, requires a multidisciplinary approach. The goals are to slow the progression of kidney disease, prevent complications, anticipate the risks of decompensation, provide support for the patient and his caregivers to maintain the best possible quality of life at home. This article describes the principles of conservative management, highlights various barriers to this care pathway, and proposes potential solutions.

Le « traitement conservateur ¼ se définit comme toute procédure thérapeutique active de prise en charge de la maladie rénale chronique au stade 5, sans recours à la suppléance par dialyse. Cette option thérapeutique est discutée chez des patients âgés, fragiles, dont l'espérance de vie anticipée est réduite en cas de recours à la dialyse. La décision de traitement conservateur repose avant tout sur un choix éclairé du patient et de son entourage. Cette prise en charge holistique, centrée sur la qualité de vie, nécessite une approche multidisciplinaire. Les objectifs sont de ralentir la progression de la maladie rénale, d'en prévenir les complications, d'anticiper les risques de décompensation, d'assurer un soutien au patient et à ses aidants afin de maintenir une qualité de vie la plus acceptable possible à domicile. Cet article décrit les principes du traitement conservateur. Nous mettons en perspective différents freins à ce parcours de soins, ainsi que les solutions qui pourraient être envisagées.

Association between GLIM-defined malnutrition and hospitalizations in kidney transplant candidates: A post hoc analysis of a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is frequent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and has a negative impact on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. The objective of this study was to assess the value of the Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria to predict hospitalizations and mortality in candidates to kidney transplant during their first year on the waiting list. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of 368 patients with advanced CKD. The main study variables were malnutrition, according to the GLIM criteria; number of hospital admissions during the first year on the waiting list; and mortality at the end of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and binary logistic regression were performed, adjusting for age, frailty status, handgrip strength, and Charlson Index as potential confounders. RESULTS: The prevalence of malnutrition was 32.6%. Malnutrition was associated with increased risk of hospitalizations during the first year on the waiting list (odds ratio [OR] = 3.33 [95% CI = 1.34-8.26]), which persisted after adjustment for age and frailty status (adjusted OR = 3.61 [95% CI = 1.38-10.7]), age and handgrip strength (adjusted OR = 3.39 [95% CI = 1.3-8.85]), and age and Charlson Index (adjusted OR = 3.25 [95% CI = 1.29-8.13]). CONCLUSION: Malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria was highly prevalent in patients with CKD and was associated with a threefold increased risk of hospitalizations during the first year on the waiting list; these associations remained significant after adjusting for age, frailty status, handgrip strength, and comorbidities.

Determinants of urgent start dialysis in a chronic kidney disease cohort followed by nephrologists.

BACKGROUND: The French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry collect dialysis initiation context for each patient starting dialysis with a flawed definition of urgent start dialysis (USD). The main objective of this study was to identify factors associated with USD in patients regularly followed-up by a nephrologist using a classification of USD considering the preparation to renal replacement therapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who started dialysis between 2012 and 2018 in the Franche-Comté region of France after a minimum of two nephrology consultations. We classified dialysis initiation context as follows: USD for patients with no dialysis access (DA) created or planned, unplanned non urgent start dialysis (UNUSD) for patients starting with a recent or non-functional DA and planned start dialysis (PSD) for those starting with a functional and mature DA. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria. According to REIN registry, 94 (20.3%) patients were urgent starters (US) whereas with our classification 80 (17.2%) and 73 (15.7%) where respectively US and unplanned non urgent starters (UNUS). The factors independently associated with USD in our classification were: stroke (odds ratio(OR) = 2.76, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=[1.41-5.43]), cardiac failure (OR = 1.78, 95%CI=[1.07-2.96]) and the number of nephrology consultations prior dialysis onset (OR = 0.73, 95%CI=[0.64-0.83]). Thirty-one patients died during the first year after dialysis start. According to our classification, we observed significantly different survival probabilities: 95.7%, 89.5% and 83.4% respectively for planned starters, UNUS and US (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The two factors independently associated with USD were cardiac failure and stroke.

Effect of sodium bicarbonate on cardiovascular outcome and mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Background: Metabolic acidosis is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Oral sodium bicarbonate is often used to treat metabolic acidosis and prevent CKD progression. However, there is limited information about the effect of sodium bicarbonate on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality in patients with pre-dialysis advanced CKD. Method: 25599 patients with CKD stage V between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2019 were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), a multi-institutional electronic medical record database in Taiwan. The exposure was defined as receiving sodium bicarbonate or not. Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score weighting between two groups. Primary outcomes were dialysis initiation, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke). The risks of dialysis, MACE, and mortality were compared between two groups using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, we performed analyzes using Fine and Gray sub-distribution hazard models that considered death as a competing risk. Result: Among 25599 patients with CKD stage V, 5084 patients (19.9%) were sodium bicarbonate users while 20515 (80.1%) were sodium bicarbonate non-users. The groups had similar risk of dialysis initiation (hazard ratio (HR): 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-1.02, p < 0.379). However, taking sodium bicarbonate was associated with a significantly lower risks of MACE (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001) and hospitalizations for acute pulmonary edema (HR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96, p < 0.001) compared with non-users. The mortality risks were significantly lower in sodium bicarbonate users compared with sodium bicarbonate non-users (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.74-0.77, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This cohort study revealed that in real world practice, use of sodium bicarbonate was associated with similar risk of dialysis compared with non-users among patients with advanced CKD stage V. Nonetheless, use of sodium bicarbonate was associated with significantly lower rate of MACE and mortality. Findings reinforce the benefits of sodium bicarbonate therapy in the expanding CKD population. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

La «Semana del Fósforo»: implicación de la nefrología española en el control de los valores plasmáticos de fósforo / The “Phosphorus Week”: Involvement of Spanish nephrologists in the control of phosphorus blood levels

Antecedentes: El adecuado control de la fosfatemia es objeto de importante preocupación por los profesionales involucrados en el cuidado de los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC), ya que los valores elevados de fósforo se encuentran directamente relacionados con un aumento de la mortalidad. Objetivos: Con el objetivo de conocer la percepción y la implicación que los nefrólogos españoles tienen de la necesidad de controlar el fósforo sérico, así como lograr una muestra lo más representativa posible de los valores séricos actuales, se organizó la denominada «Semana del Fósforo» (13-17 de noviembre de 2017). Métodos: Se invitó a participar en una encuesta on line a todos los socios de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología, que incluía preguntas sobre aspectos relacionados con el control del fósforo en pacientes con ERC avanzada (ERCA) (filtrado glomerular <30ml/min/1,73m2) y en las distintas modalidades de tratamiento renal sustitutivo (diálisis peritoneal [DP], hemodiálisis [HD] y trasplante renal [TR]). Resultados: Se obtuvieron 72 entradas de datos con 7.463 pacientes incluidos, de los cuales el 35,4% de ellos estaban en HD, el 34,8% eran TR, el 24,2% tenían ERCA y el 5,5% estaban en DP. El objetivo de fósforo sérico para los cuatro grupos de pacientes fue de 4,5mg/dl, con mínimas variaciones en función del área del territorio nacional. Los pacientes con mejor control de la fosfatemia fueron los pacientes con TR (el 93,3% presentaban valores de fósforo <4,5mg/dl), seguidos por los pacientes en ERCA (65,6% con fósforo <4,5mg/dl). Solo el 53,6% de los pacientes en HD y el 39,4% de los que estaban en DP cumplieron el objetivo de fósforo <4,5mg/dl. El grupo de pacientes en diálisis fue en el que más se prescribían captores de fósforo (73,5% y 75,6% en los pacientes en HD y DP, respectivamente), siendo menos frecuente en los pacientes en ERCA (39,9%) y solo el 4,5% en los TR. (AU)

Background: The adequate control of phosphorus levels is a major concern for professionals involved in the care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), since high phosphorus levels are directly related to an increase in mortality. Objectives: To know the perception and involvement of Spanish nephrologists on the control of phosphorus levels, the so-called “Phosphorus Week” was organized (November 13-17, 2017). Methods: All members of the Spanish Society of Nephrology were invited to participate in an online survey, which included questions on aspects related to phosphorus control in patients with advanced CKD (aCKD) (glomerular filtration rate <30ml/min/1.73m2) and in the different modalities of renal replacement therapies (peritoneal dialysis [PD], hemodialysis [HD] and renal transplantation [KT]). Results: 72 data entries were obtained in the survey with an inclusion of 7463 patients. Of them, 35.4% were on HD, 34.8% were KT, 24.2% had aCKD and 5.5% were on PD. The serum phosphorus level target for the four groups of patients was 4.5mg/dl, with minimal variations depending on the area of the national territory. The patients with better control of phosphatemia were patients with KT (93.3% had phosphorus values <4.5mg/dl), followed by patients with aCKD (65.6% with phosphorus <4.5mg/dl). Only 53.6% of the patients on HD and 39.4% of those on PD reached the phosphorus goal <4.5mg/dl. The group of patients on dialysis was the one in whom phosphorus binders prescribed the most (73.5% and 75.6% in HD and PD, respectively), being less frequent in patients with patients with aCKD (39.9%) and only 4.5% in KT. (AU)

Characteristics of Patients with Heart Failure and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (Stages 4-5) Not Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy (ERCA-IC Study).

BACKGROUND: Despite the frequent coexistence of heart failure (HF) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), it has been understudied, and little is known about its prevalence and prognostic relevance. METHODS: A retrospective study of 217 patients with advanced CKD (stages 4 and 5) who did not undergo renal replacement therapy (RRT). The patients were followed up for two years. The primary outcome was all-cause death or the need for RRT. RESULTS: Forty percent of patients had a history of HF. The mean age was 78.2 ± 8.8 years and the mean eGFR was 18.4 ± 5.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. The presence of previous HF identified a subgroup of high-risk patients with a high prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities and was significantly associated with the composite endpoint of all-cause hospitalization or need for RRT (66.7% vs. 53.1%, HR 95% CI 1.62 (1.04-2.52), p = 0.034). No differences were found in the need for RRT (27.6% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.46). Nineteen patients without HF at baseline developed HF during the follow-up and all-cause death was numerically higher (36.8 vs. 19.8%, p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced CKD have a high prevalence of HF. The presence of previous HF identified a high-risk population with a worse prognosis that required close follow-up.

Low Phase Angle Values Are Associated with Malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria in Kidney Transplant Candidates: Preliminary Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in the FRAILMar Study.

Malnutrition has a negative impact on patients with chronic diseases and its early identification is a priority. The primary objective of this diagnostic accuracy study was to assess the performance of the phase angle (PhA), a bioimpedance analysis (BIA)-derived parameter, for malnutrition screening using the Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria as the reference standard in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) waiting for kidney transplantation (KT); criteria associated with low PhA in this population were also analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios, predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for PhA (index test) and compared with GLIM criteria (reference standard). Of 63 patients (62.9 years old; 76.2% men), 22 (34.9%) had malnutrition. The PhA threshold with the highest accuracy was ≤4.85° (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 65.9%, and positive and negative likelihood ratios 2.13 and 0.41, respectively). A PhA ≤ 4.85° was associated with a 3.5-fold higher malnutrition risk (OR = 3.53 (CI95% 1.0-12.1)). Considering the GLIM criteria as the reference standard, a PhA ≤ 4.85° showed only fair validity for detecting malnutrition, and thus cannot be recommended as a stand-alone screening tool in this population.

Comorbidity and nutritional status in adult with advanced chronic kidney disease influence the decision-making choice of renal replacement therapy modality: A retrospective 5-year study.

Background: Nutritional and inflammation status are significant predictors of morbidity and mortality risk in advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD). To date, there are a limited number of clinical studies on the influence of nutritional status in ACKD stages 4-5 on the choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality. Aim: This study aimed to examine relationships between comorbidity and nutritional and inflammatory status and the decision-making on the choice of RRT modalities in adults with ACKD. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 211 patients with ACKD with stages 4-5 from 2016 to 2021. Comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) according to severity (CCI: ≤ 3 and >3 points). Clinical and nutritional assessment was carried out by prognosis nutritional index (PNI), laboratory parameters [serum s-albumin, s-prealbumin, and C-reactive protein (s-CRP)], and anthropometric measurements. The initial decision-making of the different RRT modalities [(in-center, home-based hemodialysis (HD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD)] as well as the informed therapeutic options (conservative treatment of CKD or pre-dialysis living donor transplantation) were recorded. The sample was classified according to gender, time on follow-up in the ACKD unit (≤ 6 and >6 months), and the initial decision-making of RRT (in-center and home-RRT). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were carried out for evaluating the independent predictors of home-based RRT. Results: Of the 211 patients with ACKD, 47.4% (n = 100) were in stage 5 CKD, mainly elderly men (65.4%). DM was the main etiology of CKD (22.7%) together with hypertension (96.6%) as a CV risk factor. Higher CCI scores were significantly found in men, and severe comorbidity with a CCI score > 3 points was 99.1%. The mean time of follow-up time in the ACKD unit was 9.6 ± 12.8 months. A significantly higher CCI was found in those patients with a follow-up time > 6 months, as well as higher mean values of eGFR, s-albumin, s-prealbumin, s-transferrin, and hemoglobin, and lower s-CRP than those with a follow-up <6 months (all, at least p < 0.05). The mean PNI score was 38.9 ± 5.5 points, and a PNI score ≤ 39 points was found in 36.5%. S-albumin level > 3.8 g/dl was found in 71.1% (n = 150), and values of s-CRP ≤ 1 mg/dl were 82.9% (n = 175). PEW prevalence was 15.2%. The initial choice of RRT modality was higher in in-center HD (n = 119 patients; 56.4%) than in home-based RRT (n = 81; 40.5%). Patients who chose home-based RRT had significantly lower CCI scores and higher mean values of s-albumin, s-prealbumin, s-transferrin, hemoglobin, and eGFR and lower s-CRP than those who chose in-center RRT (p < 0.001). Logistic regression demonstrated that s-albumin (OR: 0.147) and a follow-up time in the ACKD unit >6 months (OR: 0.440) were significantly associated with the likelihood of decision-making to choose a home-based RRT modality (all, at least p < 0.05). Conclusion: Regular monitoring and follow-up of sociodemographic factors, comorbidity, and nutritional and inflammatory status in a multidisciplinary ACKD unit significantly influenced decision-making on the choice of RRT modality and outcome in patients with non-dialysis ACKD.